<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital luggage scale by Design Go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trustypony.com/2009/01/16/digital-luggage-scale-by-design-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trustypony.com/2009/01/16/digital-luggage-scale-by-design-go/</link>
	<description>Travel Goods Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:45:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jhongavin</title>
		<link>http://trustypony.com/2009/01/16/digital-luggage-scale-by-design-go/comment-page-1/#comment-8331</link>
		<dc:creator>jhongavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustypony.com/?p=2708#comment-8331</guid>
		<description>Very cute and portable luggage scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cute and portable luggage scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://trustypony.com/2009/01/16/digital-luggage-scale-by-design-go/comment-page-1/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustypony.com/?p=2708#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>Bought this product but it stopped working after used it once. 
My advice: Don&#039;t take the risk and go for a simple mechanical scale if you really need one. perhaps not as accurate but indeed much more reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought this product but it stopped working after used it once.<br />
My advice: Don&#8217;t take the risk and go for a simple mechanical scale if you really need one. perhaps not as accurate but indeed much more reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
