<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pogo Instant Digital Camera by Polaroid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trustypony.com/2009/04/06/pogo-instant-digital-camera-by-polaroid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trustypony.com/2009/04/06/pogo-instant-digital-camera-by-polaroid/</link>
	<description>Travel Goods Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:31:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Kegans</title>
		<link>http://trustypony.com/2009/04/06/pogo-instant-digital-camera-by-polaroid/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Kegans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustypony.com/?p=3683#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>i just read about this. sounds kinda cool, esp. since film-backed polaroid&#039;s aren&#039;t an option anymore...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just read about this. sounds kinda cool, esp. since film-backed polaroid&#8217;s aren&#8217;t an option anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berit Thorkelson</title>
		<link>http://trustypony.com/2009/04/06/pogo-instant-digital-camera-by-polaroid/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Berit Thorkelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustypony.com/?p=3683#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s the same reason anyone would need the original type. Except &quot;anyone&quot; would have to be much richer in this case :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s the same reason anyone would need the original type. Except &#8220;anyone&#8221; would have to be much richer in this case <img src='http://trustypony.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://trustypony.com/2009/04/06/pogo-instant-digital-camera-by-polaroid/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustypony.com/?p=3683#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  Having trouble figuring out why anyone would need this....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  Having trouble figuring out why anyone would need this&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

